Ask a random user his least favorite aspect of Windows 10 and there's a good chance he will say something about updates.
![Reviews Reviews](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-PC8DeMVKDsE/T0pOyli6arI/AAAAAAAAAIc/PJgFZbyUW9c/s1600/FastStone+Capture.jpg)
Although OS updates are undeniably important, they are sometimes annoying and disruptive if IT doesn't manage them properly. Updates can interrupt desktop sessions, send bothersome push notifications and cause data loss.
Pdffactory pro 4 keygen. Bulletstorm fairlight crack download facebook cara crack sid retail pro. Windows xp professional sp1 sp2 and sp3 activation keygen. Windows XP Professional Sp3 Product Keys Generator Free. Discover ideas about Explorer 8. Operating System Spy Windows 8 Retail Software Magic Iphone Secrets Revealed Programming. Windows 10 Manager Crack 2017 Full Serial Key Generator.
Thankfully, there are some Windows 10 updates options that limit the inconvenience of the update process.
Deploy a Windows Server Update Services server
When it comes to making updates more palatable to end users, the first thing IT should do is deploy a Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) server. The proper Group Policy settings can force PCs to get their updates from the WSUS server rather than from Windows Update.
Running all desktop updates through a WSUS server will accomplish a few important things. First, using a WSUS server can significantly reduce update-related internet congestion. With a WSUS server, IT can download the update once and distribute it throughout the organization rather than requiring each PC to update on its own.
Another improvement a WSUS server provides is more management capabilities. IT can still use Group Policy settings to customize update behavior even without a WSUS server, but using a WSUS server to manage Windows 10 updates options enables IT to approve updates on an individual basis.
This is important because one common Windows 10 update issue is that updates sometimes break previously functioning systems. By implementing an update approval process, IT professionals can ensure that they have time to test updates before deployment.
Schedule updates to occur at a convenient time
IT can schedule updates to take place late at night, early in the morning or whenever users aren't on their desktops. Users don't want to stop what they are doing and wait for an update to complete.
When developing an update schedule, IT must consider that even if the workday officially ends at 5:00 p.m., some users might work later. If the workday starts at 8:00 a.m., there may be users who come in early. It is impossible to please everyone when it comes to Windows 10 updates options for scheduling, but IT should try to find a schedule that works for most users.
IT can control when Windows Update runs by setting the PC's active hours. To set the active hours, an IT pro can open the Group Policy Object Editor and navigate to Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Windows Components > Windows Update. He can then choose the Turn Off Auto-Restart setting for Updates During Active Hours. Enabling this setting gives IT the opportunity to set the start time and the end time for the active hours period.
Hide update notifications and expedite log offs
Another one of IT's Windows 10 updates options is to hide update notifications. This ensures that users are never bothered with notifications of impending updates, and it is easy to do using Group Policy settings.
To establish this setting, open the Group Policy Editor and navigate to Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Windows Components > Windows Update. The name of the Group Policy setting that controls whether or not users see update notifications is Allow Non-Administrators to Receive Update Notifications.
There are other Windows 10 updates options for IT to consider, including a mechanism that automatically logs off users after a period of inactivity. If left unchecked, Windows Update reboots may cause users to lose whatever they were working on at the time of the reboot. Forcing a logoff after a period of inactivity may not be popular with the users, but it will get them into the habit of saving their work so they do not suffer data loss as the result of an update-related reboot.
Related Resources
- UK IT Priorities 2019–ComputerWeekly.com
- Updates: The next evolution of operating systems–ComputerWeekly.com
- AdminStudio Application Virtualization–Flexera Software
- Microsoft Windows 10 Migration–Flexera Software
Dig Deeper on Windows 10
Technology Advances Require Basic IP Address Understanding
Wonky Wi-Fi Forces Public Network Status
Hello Face Yes Hello Face No
Lenovo X380 Ethernet Extension Follies
MS 19Q4 Financials Offer Interesting Insights
Despite Windows 10 issues, customers remain confident in OS
IT wary of Windows 10 adoption despite approaching deadline
MS Valuation Hits Trillion Dollar Mark
How to find Wi-Fi settings in Windows 10
configuration service provider (CSP)
Windows 10 Update Assistant
Top Windows 10 April 2018 Update features you need to know
Win10 Minimum Hardware Requirements Get Interesting
X1 Carbon Extreme 6-Core Really Flies
Samsung Consumer Drivers OEM Friendly
Retiring Older PC Upon Long Service
Technology Advances Require Basic IP Address Understanding
Hello Face Yes Hello Face No
MS Store Now Includes Notepad
Defender PowerShell Hash Mismatches Fix Coming
Wonky Wi-Fi Forces Public Network Status
Lenovo X380 Ethernet Extension Follies
Partially Disconnected USB Cable Puts Mouse MIA
1903 Hyper-V Networking Interference?
- Brien Posey asks:
What are some other ways IT can take control of Windows 10 updates?
![Sid Sid](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Ly_lGBQ9wGM/T16E1Fu-N7I/AAAAAAAAAKM/otT5tzQxjSY/s1600/2D&3D+Screen+Saver+Maker.jpg)
- Optimizing Your Digital Workspaces? Look to Analytics–Citrix
- A New Security Strategy that Protects the Organization When Work Is Happening ...–Citrix
- End-User Service Delivery: Why IT Must Move Up the Stack to Deliver Real Value–Citrix
Related Content
- What IT needs to know about Windows 10 update ...– SearchEnterpriseDesktop
- Three critical security updates for Windows due in ...– SearchWindowsServer
- Install WSUS updates immediately with Windows ...– SearchWindowsServer
Co-presidents of the 2019 Women's March, Linda Sarsour, left, and Tamika Mallory, center, marching with Jewish Women of Color during the Washington D.C. Women's March on Saturday, Jan. 19, 2019
Women’s March Inc. has lost relevance.
I see many headlines about Linda Sarsour, who is willing to renounce Farrakhan but will not allow a place for Zionists in her world, and about Tamika Mallory, who has a personal connection to Farrakhan and thus cannot renounce him while she also embraces a Palestinian narrative so that she cannot outright say that the Jewish homeland of Israel deserves to exist. None of these issues, might I note, have anything to do with women’s rights. They do have to do with furthering specific agendas and with an organization allowing controversies surrounding its personalities to take the spotlight off women’s issues.
I want to share a number of pieces I read recently which expound on some of these issues in a better way than I can. I also want to point to the danger of this unnecessary and harmful wedge being driven between blacks and Jews.
First, your “reading assignments:”
- Former co-founder and eloquent critic, Mercy Morganfield, black, Jewish, a former leader of the DC march nails it on the head in her Facebook post, Why Is Everyone Blaming Tamika? “I wouldn’t have to denounce Farrakhan because I wouldn’t have been sitting there praising him in the first place.” She also writes, “For the past two years, issues that impact black women and girls in the U.S. have taken a backseat to issues that impact Palestinian women. Awareness of ignorant religious dogma has replaced awareness around issues impacting black women in the black community. People are now more aware of the dumb shit Farrakhan says than they are the plight of missing black girls in Chicago. This is deeply problematic.” (I agree. I also might add that I know Jewish women of color do not feel well represented in the Jewish world and I understand that there is work to do, but for Linda Sarsour and Tamika Mallory to walk behind a JWOC banner in DC, to me, is tantamount to handing over representation of the JWOC viewpoints, whatever they may be, to non-Jewish women. So what is accomplished here?
- While Morgenfield points out what the Women’s March Inc. is not doing for WOC, Phyllis Chesler’s Times of Israel blog, while harshly titled, points out all the feminist activity they are also not doing for women everywhere. “They stage events,” she notes, “not revolutions.” She has a long history of actual feminist activism and takes a deep dive. Among other things, in The Women’s March is a Con Job, Chesler calls out their recent additions of Jewish women to their board, as silly as this sounds, for being too intersectional. And while that may rile feathers, I think I get it. Personally, I would very much want to see an avowedly Zionist Jewish woman being embraced by its leadership…but harbor no illusion that this will ever happen. Then again, I think the leaders are so much of a distraction, it’s time for them themselves to offer to step aside in order not to be the headlines.
- Algemeiner, a right-leaning Jewish publication, also posted a story about Morganfield’s criticism of Linda Sarsour, Former Women’s March Leader Upbraids ‘Antisemite’ Linda Sarsour for Posting Article Claiming Jews Are Waging War on Black People. She is right; I’d add that fanning flames does not make for progressiveness, my friends. This only escalates the tension.
- The same week that the New York Times published an op-ed by Michelle Alexander, a regular columnist, who sadly used Martin Luther King Jr.’s memory to further anti-Israel bias (see Algemeiner’s critique and TOI’s), it also published an interesting perspective. Its There is no Israeli-Palestinian conflict headline notwithstanding, Matt Friedman’s words ring true especially where leaders are concerned (ya hear, Linda and Tamika??): “Abandoning the pleasures of the simple story for the confusing realities of the bigger picture is emotionally unsatisfying. An observer is denied a clear villain or an ideal solution. But it does make events here comprehensible, and it will encourage Western policymakers to abandon fantastic visions in favor of a more reasonable grasp of what’s possible. And that, in turn, might lead to some tangible improvements in a world that could use fewer illusions and wiser leaders.” Nothing is simple, and speaking from convenience helps solve nothing.
- Just as the situation in Israel is complex, issues with the Women’s March, too, go deep, per this extensive Tablet expose, Is the Women’s March melting down? They warrant discussion. If the money they raise is not used to support state marches or activities or women other than the leaders, then exactly what are they doing with it? What is the relationship between the multiple organizations? Etc.
- Of all the headlines Women’s March Inc. generates, how many have to do with actual work on the ground? With this year’s march, they finally released a detailed policy agenda, pointing out what they want to advocate for. I do not know if they plan on taking on the work of organizing and lobbying, but still, we are talking about a 71-page policy paper; that’s a lot of meat. Regarding its content, The Times of Israel quotes the document in its coverage, “One of the biggest threats to speech today are the attempts to silence social movements, including those advocating for Palestinian rights, Black liberation in the United States, Indigenous rights and environmental progress.” (On this, allow me to say what I’ve written before – one can be pro-Palestinian rights without being anti-Israel; see my blogs linked below.) Why not add Zionism to the list of social movements? The tactics of Students for Justice in Palestine on too many campuses does not stop at advocating but instead intimidates, itself attempting to suppress free speech. The policy also speaks against anti-BDS legislation. For the record, while I oppose BDS, I also think that legislation which prohibits government bodies from doing business with companies that adhere to BDS is also wrong. But even if I were to agree, this does not mean that the Women’s March should be opining on this in its agenda.
The more I read of those thinking BDS will magically change anything, the more I want people to study history and to understand the depth and complexity of the issues at hand. Advocating for the Israeli government to treat Palestinians better does not have to translate into anti-Zionism. Nor does it mean that attention need not be paid to how the Palestinians’ own leadership uses its people.
And so here we are, at a shameless plug for some of my own blogs, in reverse chronological order:
- What we should be saying in place of “End the occupation” shows why placing the burden entirely on Israel cannot move anything forwards.
- It’s not Farrakhan that is the issue explains why anti-Zionist anti-Semitism is actually what we need to be focusing on.
- A change is in the air came out after an award to Women’s March Inc. was rescinded. Since then, a number of other organizations have disassociated from them.
In my blogs I also talk about the definition of Zionism, i.e., a movement to a Jewish homeland. Nowhere does it say exclusively Jewish. And for anyone to think so is flat out wrong.
Israel, the homeland of the Jewish people, exists. To be anti-Zionist is to say it should not, period. To be critical of the Israeli government is allowed and encouraged, but it should not be synonymous with anti-Zionism. At all. Ever. When you deny a nation the right to its home, you are practicing anti-Semitism. In my blogs, I also link to the internationally accepted working definition of anti-Semitism (see especially the PDF’s page 2). Anti-Zionism is a form of anti-Semitism by denying Israel’s legitimacy. It tells the Jewish people – a nation which has been unwanted in so many of the countries it has sojourned in and is the target of rising acts of bias and violence across the globe – that its people are less deserving than anyone else of a home.
People confuse religion with nationhood. The Jewish people are a nation. But because of this, when told that their anti-Zionistic statements are in fact anti-Semitic, get immediately defensive, ending all possibilities for them to hear how even if they think that if they harbor no hate towards Jewish people, they cannot possibly be anti-Semitic. It requires a nuanced understanding, and is often difficult to explain, especially to Jews who wave their anti-Zionistic flag without understanding that they are condemning their own people to be homeless. I wiggle out of it by explaining that their stance is anti-Semitic even if they are not. Definitionally.
Once can be pro-Palestinian and be Zionist. I am. I firmly believe the both peoples need a nation of their own. But I also believe that such a resolution can only come by both sides negotiating. Not by people pressuring Israel by BDS. (Again, see my blogs.) And surprise, one can be critical of Israel’s government and be a Zionist too.
To be honest, I don’t understand why people need to focus on Women March Inc.’s national leadership – it neither funds nor supports the state marches that haven’t abandoned them. And other than its position paper which talks about a boatload of issues, all I see are headlines regarding personalities, Farrakhan and finances. Do they organize at a grassroots level or lobby in the halls of Congress or bring lawsuits to advance women’s issues anywhere? Do they underwrite women in need? There are many active women’s organizations out there worthy of support that actually do things. Year-round. Not just marching one day a year. Perhaps they deserve our attention instead.
My biggest fear now is that by trying to pin blame on who and how support for the Women’s March’s has disintegrated, by measuring who shows up and why, as well as by allowing different tolerance levels for right-wing anti-Semitism (like Farrakhan’s) and left-wing anti-Semitism (anti-Zionism), a wedge will be driven between two minority communities that ought to be banding together.
And we don’t need any more of that. What women need instead of Women’s March Inc. are leaders who will bring us together around a banner of women’s needs and concerns.